Global Urolithiasis Management Devices Market Growth, Share, Size, Trends and Forecast (2025 - 2031)

By Treatment Type;

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), Intracorporeal Lithotripsy, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, and Others

By Product Type;

Lithotripters and Ureteroscopes

By End Use;

Hospitals & Clinics and Ambulatory Surgical Centers

By Geography;

North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and Latin America - Report Timeline (2021 - 2031)
Report ID: Rn108480581 Published Date: May, 2025 Updated Date: June, 2025

Urolithiasis Management Devices Market Overview

Urolithiasis Management Devices Market (USD Million)

Urolithiasis Management Devices Market was valued at USD 1,578.96 million in the year 2024. The size of this market is expected to increase to USD 2,239.59 million by the year 2031, while growing at a Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.1%.


Global Urolithiasis Management Devices Market Growth, Share, Size, Trends and Forecast

*Market size in USD million

CAGR 5.1 %


Study Period2025 - 2031
Base Year2024
CAGR (%)5.1 %
Market Size (2024)USD 1,578.96 Million
Market Size (2031)USD 2,239.59 Million
Market ConcentrationMedium
Report Pages332
1,578.96
2024
2,239.59
2031

Major Players

  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Cook Medical
  • Olympus Corporation
  • C. R. Bard, Inc
  • Dornier MedTech
  • Richard Wolf GmbH
  • Stryker Corporation
  • Karl Storz SE & Co. KG
  • Medtronic plc
  • Coloplast Group

Market Concentration

Consolidated - Market dominated by 1 - 5 major players

Global Urolithiasis Management Devices Market

Fragmented - Highly competitive market without dominant players


The Urolithiasis Management Devices Market is witnessing consistent momentum, primarily fueled by the growing burden of kidney stone disorders. Sedentary habits, lack of hydration, and unhealthy diets have escalated the prevalence of this condition. This surge is amplifying the need for efficient diagnostic and therapeutic solutions.

Surge in Minimally Invasive Procedures
Modern urology practices are increasingly adopting minimally invasive technologies to treat urolithiasis. Devices like ureteroscopes and lithotripters are now standard, offering quicker recovery and better patient outcomes. Over 65% of stone removal procedures are conducted using non-invasive methods, reflecting strong practitioner and patient preference for such technologies.

Technology-Led Innovation in Treatment Devices
Innovations in device design and performance, particularly through laser and digital technologies, are transforming urolithiasis care. Enhanced precision and safety features have become essential. Roughly 40% of next-generation devices now come equipped with laser lithotripsy or advanced visualization tools to optimize treatment efficiency.

Healthcare Policies Encouraging Early Intervention
Expanding healthcare funding and growing public education efforts are facilitating broader access to urolithiasis treatment solutions. Preventive programs and integrated care frameworks are encouraging timely diagnosis. Nearly 50% of healthcare facilities have embedded stone management protocols into their standard diagnostic practices, driving device utilization across institutions.

  1. Introduction
    1. Research Objectives and Assumptions
    2. Research Methodology
    3. Abbreviations
  2. Market Definition & Study Scope
  3. Executive Summary
    1. Market Snapshot, By Treatment Type
    2. Market Snapshot, By Product Type
    3. Market Snapshot, By End Use
    4. Market Snapshot, By Region
  4. Urolithiasis Management Devices Market Dynamics
    1. Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities
      1. Drivers
        1. Increasing prevalence of kidney stones

        2. Growing demand for minimally invasive procedures

        3. Rising awareness about urological disorders

      2. Restraints
        1. Complex and inconsistent reimbursement policies

        2. Risk of urinary tract damage and post-procedure complications

        3. Low awareness and limited infrastructure in developing regions

      3. Opportunities
        1. Development of innovative urology devices

        2. Strategic collaborations and partnerships

        3. Rising adoption of lithotripsy devices

      PEST Analysis
      1. Political Analysis
      2. Economic Analysis
      3. Social Analysis
      4. Technological Analysis
    2. Porter's Analysis
      1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
      2. Bargaining Power of Buyers
      3. Threat of Substitutes
      4. Threat of New Entrants
      5. Competitive Rivalry
  5. Market Segmentation
    1. Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, By Treatment Type, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL)
      2. Intracorporeal Lithotripsy
      3. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
      4. Others
    2. Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, By Product Type, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)

      1. Lithotripters

      2. Ureteroscopes

    3. Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, By End Use, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. Hospitals & Clinics
      2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    4. Urolithiasis Management Devices Market, By Geography, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. North America
        1. United States
        2. Canada
      2. Europe
        1. Germany
        2. United Kingdom
        3. France
        4. Italy
        5. Spain
        6. Nordic
        7. Benelux
        8. Rest of Europe
      3. Asia Pacific
        1. Japan
        2. China
        3. India
        4. Australia & New Zealand
        5. South Korea
        6. ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Countries)
        7. Rest of Asia Pacific
      4. Middle East & Africa
        1. GCC
        2. Israel
        3. South Africa
        4. Rest of Middle East & Africa
      5. Latin America
        1. Brazil
        2. Mexico
        3. Argentina
        4. Rest of Latin America
  6. Competitive Landscape
    1. Company Profiles
      1. Boston Scientific Corporation
      2. Cook Medical
      3. Olympus Corporation
      4. C. R. Bard, Inc
      5. Dornier MedTech
      6. Richard Wolf GmbH
      7. Stryker Corporation
      8. Karl Storz SE & Co. KG
      9. Medtronic plc
      10. Coloplast Group
  7. Analyst Views
  8. Future Outlook of the Market