Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market
By Cancer;
Prostate, Cervical, Colorectal, Throat and OthersBy Application;
Mononucleosis, Endemic Burkitts Lymphoma, Hodgkins Lymphoma, Gastric Carcinomas, Multiple sclerosis and Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaBy Geography;
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa and Latin America - Report Timeline (2021 - 2031)Monovaccine (Epstein - Barr virus) Market Overview
Monovaccine (Epstein - Barr virus) Market (USD Million)
Monovaccine (Epstein - Barr virus) Market was valued at USD 165.12 million in the year 2024. The size of this market is expected to increase to USD 282.99 million by the year 2031, while growing at a Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8.0%.
Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market
*Market size in USD million
CAGR 8.0 %
| Study Period | 2025 - 2031 |
|---|---|
| Base Year | 2024 |
| CAGR (%) | 8.0 % |
| Market Size (2024) | USD 165.12 Million |
| Market Size (2031) | USD 282.99 Million |
| Market Concentration | Medium |
| Report Pages | 338 |
Major Players
- GlaxoSmithKline plc
- Merck & Co., Inc.
- Pfizer Inc.
- Sanofi S.A.
- Johnson & Johnson
- Novavax, Inc.
- Bavarian Nordic
- Sinovac Biotech Ltd.
- Bharat Biotech International Limited
- Moderna, Inc.
- BioNTech SE
- CureVac AG
- AstraZeneca plc
- Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd.
- Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited
Market Concentration
Consolidated - Market dominated by 1 - 5 major players
Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market
Fragmented - Highly competitive market without dominant players
The Monovaccine Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Market is experiencing notable growth, driven by the increasing urgency to combat EBV-related health conditions. EBV, a type of herpesvirus, is associated with a range of illnesses including infectious mononucleosis and certain cancers. The rising prevalence of such conditions is accelerating the need for monovalent vaccines that offer targeted protection against this specific virus, aligning with the broader trend toward personalized immunization strategies.
Innovation Driving Market Expansion
Technological advancements and a surge in research initiatives are propelling market expansion. Approximately 40% of EBV vaccine development projects are currently backed by collaborations between public institutions and private entities. Emerging vaccine platforms—such as mRNA, subunit vaccines, and virus-like particles (VLPs)—are revolutionizing the development pipeline, enhancing both the effectiveness and scalability of EBV monovaccines.
High Unmet Clinical Need
The absence of an approved EBV vaccine continues to represent a major unmet medical need. With nearly 70% of individuals exposed to EBV during childhood or adolescence, there is a strong demand for preventative measures. Furthermore, the increasing incidence of EBV-related cancers, including Hodgkin’s lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, highlights the critical role of a dedicated monovaccine in reducing disease burden and improving long-term outcomes.
Regulatory and Funding Support
A favorable regulatory framework and growing institutional support are key enablers of market growth. More than 55% of development costs are being subsidized by government bodies and global health organizations, creating a conducive environment for innovation. This financial backing is helping to accelerate research timelines, reduce entry barriers, and stimulate investment from both established players and emerging biotech firms.
Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market Key Takeaways
-
Rising prevalence of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-related diseases, such as mononucleosis and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, is driving the development of vaccines for EBV prevention.
-
Advancements in vaccine research are improving the efficacy and safety of EBV monovaccines, with a focus on reducing viral load and preventing associated cancers.
-
Clinical trials and government funding are accelerating the development of EBV vaccines, bringing hope for a preventive solution to control EBV infections globally.
-
North America and Europe lead the market, with strong healthcare infrastructure and increasing investment in vaccine research.
-
Asia-Pacific is expected to see growth, particularly in countries with high incidences of EBV-related cancers, where a vaccine would provide significant public health benefits.
-
Public awareness of EBV and its associated risks is increasing, driving demand for preventative healthcare solutions such as monovaccines.
-
Strategic partnerships between pharmaceutical companies and research institutions are boosting the development and commercialization of EBV vaccines.
Monovaccine (Epstein - Barr virus) Market Recent Developments
-
In March 2023, OPKO Health, Inc. announced that its subsidiary ModeX Therapeutics had entered into an exclusive global collaboration with Merck to advance the development of MDX-2201, a nanoparticle-based vaccine candidate targeting the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). The deal included an upfront payment of $50 million and potential milestone-based rewards, reinforcing a shared commitment to innovative vaccine technologies and infectious disease research.
-
In May 2022, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate a monovalent Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) vaccine, focusing on its safety and immunogenicity in healthy adults. This study marked an important milestone in advancing EBV vaccine research and aligns with NIH’s strategy to prevent EBV-related diseases such as infectious mononucleosis and certain cancers.
Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market Segment Analysis
In this report, the Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market has been segmented by Cancer, Application and Geography.
Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market, Segmentation by Cancer
The Cancer segmentation reflects indications in which Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV) is implicated in pathogenesis or disease progression and where a monovalent EBV vaccine could support prophylaxis, adjuvant strategies, or long-term risk reduction. Developers are aligning trial design with oncology endpoints, biomarker strategies, and regional screening protocols to maximize translational impact. Partnerships across biotech–academic consortia and public–private initiatives are expected to shape timelines, while manufacturing readiness and regulatory clarity will influence adoption.
ProstateIn the Prostate segment, stakeholders assess correlations between viral antigens and immune surveillance to refine target profiles, even as evidence strength varies across cohorts. Investment tends to prioritize biomarker discovery, immune-epidemiology, and real-world registries that can support hypothesis generation for vaccine utility. Over the medium term, trial feasibility, companion diagnostics, and payer interest in preventing downstream disease burden will determine strategic focus.
CervicalThe Cervical cancer segment considers populations where co-infections and regional screening programs shape vaccine health-economics. While HPV is the dominant etiologic driver, EBV-oriented strategies may be explored in subgroups to understand immune priming and potential co-factor roles. Sponsors emphasize public health alignment, integrated vaccination campaigns, and data generation that clarifies incremental benefit, which together guide market access narratives and long-term uptake.
ColorectalIn Colorectal cancer, clinical interest is centered on tumor microenvironment modulation and the characterization of viral antigens that may influence disease biology. Programs that combine vaccine platforms with immunotherapy or prevention frameworks will likely progress through exploratory endpoints first. Evidence consolidation, multi-center collaboration, and transparent data sharing are vital to move from signal detection to registrational strategies and sustainable adoption.
ThroatThe Throat segment (including head and neck contexts) explores EBV-associated pathways, particularly where mucosal immunity and viral latency may affect risk trajectories. Companies are investing in antigen selection, delivery technologies, and durable response profiling to strengthen clinical rationale. Success will hinge on patient stratification, pragmatic trial designs, and the ability to demonstrate meaningful outcomes that translate into payer-supported prevention or adjunctive use.
OthersThe Others category captures emerging oncology signals across diverse tumor types where EBV involvement requires further evidence maturation. Here, sponsors typically pursue early-phase studies, biobanking, and mechanistic research to refine target populations. This segment can become a growth option through adaptive trial platforms, global site networks, and collaborations that accelerate learning cycles and de-risk later-stage investments.
Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market, Segmentation by Application
The Application axis maps core EBV-related diseases where a monovaccine has a compelling public health and clinical rationale. Developers weigh incidence, burden of disease, and healthcare infrastructure to prioritize indications for prevention or disease modification. As manufacturing scalability, cold-chain readiness, and programmatic delivery improve, applications that align with national immunization strategies and value-based procurement will see faster diffusion.
MononucleosisMononucleosis represents a foundational prophylactic use-case, leveraging clear infection dynamics and high symptomatic impact in adolescents and young adults. Programs emphasize population-level benefits, missed school/work days avoided, and the potential to reduce downstream EBV-associated conditions. Success factors include long-term immunity profiling, safety in broad cohorts, and payer recognition of productivity and quality-of-life gains.
Endemic Burkitts LymphomaIn Endemic Burkitts Lymphoma, strategies focus on regions with high EBV exposure and co-factors, aiming to reduce pediatric oncology burden. Partnerships with global health agencies, access-oriented pricing, and integrated surveillance are pivotal to equitable deployment. Evidence that links vaccination to risk reduction and earlier detection frameworks can drive strong health-economic justification and sustainable program funding.
Hodgkins LymphomaHodgkins Lymphoma applications prioritize understanding the interplay between EBV latency and immune dysfunction in defined subtypes. Developers are designing immunogenicity endpoints, banking tissue samples, and exploring adjunctive schedules alongside standard therapies. Clear demonstration of clinical relevance, manageable safety, and improvement in meaningful outcomes will shape stakeholder confidence and pathway integration.
Gastric CarcinomasFor Gastric Carcinomas, the focus is on EBV-positive molecular subsets where viral antigens may inform preventive strategies. Programs integrate biomarker-driven enrollment, long-term follow-up, and collaboration with gastrointestinal oncology networks to validate benefit. Adoption will be supported by real-world evidence, regional screening tie-ins, and pricing models that reflect the downstream savings from reduced disease burden.
Multiple sclerosisIn Multiple sclerosis, mounting epidemiologic and immunologic rationale positions EBV prophylaxis as a potential disease-modifying strategy over the long term. Sponsors emphasize longitudinal cohorts, neuroimmunology endpoints, and safety in at-risk populations. If clinical benefit is substantiated, payer interest will likely hinge on lifetime cost offsets, disability reduction, and the capacity to integrate vaccination into neurology care pathways.
Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal Carcinoma is a high-priority application in geographies with elevated incidence and clear EBV association. Developers target mucosal immunity, durable antibody responses, and controlled exposure settings to build robust evidence. Strategic partnerships with regional cancer centers, culturally tailored awareness, and aligned reimbursement can catalyze uptake and inform broader EBV oncology strategies.
Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market, Segmentation by Geography
In this report, the Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market has been segmented by Geography into five regions: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa and Latin America.
Regions and Countries Analyzed in this Report
North America shows strong momentum due to advanced clinical trial infrastructure, high research funding, and mature regulatory pathways. Collaboration between biopharma, academic centers, and public health agencies supports faster protocol initiation and evidence generation. Market access will be shaped by value-based evaluation, readiness of immunization programs, and transparent communication on safety and long-term outcomes.
EuropeEurope benefits from well-established oncology networks, multi-country trial capabilities, and harmonizing regulatory frameworks that facilitate cross-border studies. Health-technology assessments and cost-effectiveness thresholds strongly influence adoption, directing sponsors to build rigorous real-world datasets. Strategic alignment with national immunization agendas and public-private partnerships will be key to accelerating uptake.
Asia PacificAsia Pacific is a critical growth region given varying EBV disease burden, expanding biotech ecosystems, and increasing investments in vaccine manufacturing. Countries prioritize local clinical evidence, supply reliability, and pricing that matches public health goals. Partnerships with regional cancer centers and integration into preventive care frameworks can unlock scale, particularly where nasopharyngeal carcinoma incidence is elevated.
Middle East & AfricaMiddle East & Africa focuses on capacity-building, strengthening surveillance systems, and improving access to innovative vaccines through donor support and tiered pricing. Pilot introductions aligned with public health objectives and workforce training will be essential to ensure program fidelity. Multi-stakeholder collaboration, cold-chain enhancement, and evidence tailored to local epidemiology will guide phased adoption.
Latin AmericaLatin America continues to expand interest through regional research networks, improving regulatory clarity, and partnerships that enable cost-optimized supply. Success will rely on pragmatic trial designs, pharmacovigilance, and alignment with immunization schedules to sustain coverage. Countries emphasizing health equity, predictable procurement, and transparent communication on outcomes are positioned to move earliest toward broader deployment.
Monovaccine (Epstein - Barr virus) Market Forces
This report provides an in depth analysis of various factors that impact the dynamics of Monovaccine (Epstein - Barr virus) Market. These factors include; Market Drivers, Restraints, and Opportunities.
Comprehensive Market Impact Matrix
This matrix outlines how core market forces Drivers, Restraints, and Opportunities affect key business dimensions including Growth, Competition, Customer Behavior, Regulation, and Innovation.
| Market Forces ↓ / Impact Areas → | Market Growth Rate | Competitive Landscape | Customer Behavior | Regulatory Influence | Innovation Potential |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drivers | High impact (e.g., tech adoption, rising demand) | Encourages new entrants and fosters expansion | Increases usage and enhances demand elasticity | Often aligns with progressive policy trends | Fuels R&D initiatives and product development |
| Restraints | Slows growth (e.g., high costs, supply chain issues) | Raises entry barriers and may drive market consolidation | Deters consumption due to friction or low awareness | Introduces compliance hurdles and regulatory risks | Limits innovation appetite and risk tolerance |
| Opportunities | Unlocks new segments or untapped geographies | Creates white space for innovation and M&A | Opens new use cases and shifts consumer preferences | Policy shifts may offer strategic advantages | Sparks disruptive innovation and strategic alliances |
Drivers, Restraints and Opportunity Analysis
Drivers:
- Increasing prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus-related diseases
- Growing awareness of Epstein-Barr virus's role in cancers and other conditions
- Advances in biotechnology driving monovaccine innovation
-
Rising demand for personalized treatment options -The growing preference for personalized treatment strategies is emerging as a powerful driver for the Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) market. As healthcare evolves toward more patient-centric models, there is increasing recognition that traditional, standardized approaches may not adequately address individual differences in immune response and disease risk. This shift is especially relevant in the case of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), where infection outcomes and susceptibility to related complications—such as autoimmune diseases and certain cancers—can vary widely among individuals.
Personalized vaccine development allows for more precise targeting of the virus by taking into account a person’s genetic profile, immune system status, and preexisting conditions. For example, individuals genetically predisposed to EBV-associated malignancies may benefit from specialized vaccines designed to offer broader or more focused protection. This approach enhances vaccine efficacy, reduces the likelihood of adverse effects, and promotes longer-lasting immunity, particularly in populations with high vulnerability to EBV reactivation or chronic complications.
Biotechnology companies are increasingly leveraging innovations in immune profiling and genomic analysis to tailor EBV vaccine candidates. This allows for the identification of key biomarkers and immune targets, making it possible to design vaccines that are not only more effective but also better tolerated. These advancements align with the broader trend of precision medicine, where treatment is tailored to match an individual’s unique biological characteristics rather than applying a generalized solution.
Consumer awareness is also playing a role in driving demand. As more patients seek healthcare solutions that reflect their specific health profiles, there is growing support for vaccines that go beyond broad-spectrum prevention. This demand is encouraging biopharmaceutical firms to invest in the development of next-generation, customized EBV vaccines, which are expected to see increasing uptake as part of a proactive approach to disease prevention.
Restraints:
- Complex nature of Epstein-Barr virus
- Limited understanding of virus pathogenesis
- Regulatory hurdles and approval processes
-
Concerns about vaccine safety - Safety concerns continue to act as a significant barrier to the adoption of monovaccines targeting the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). While the need for effective preventive solutions is growing, many individuals remain hesitant to accept vaccines that are still in clinical development or use relatively new technologies. This hesitation is often driven by fears of side effects, long-term health risks, and the lack of widespread familiarity with EBV-related complications, especially in asymptomatic individuals. Public uncertainty is further intensified by the spread of misinformation and inconsistent messaging across media channels, making it harder to build trust in new vaccine initiatives.
The introduction of advanced vaccine technologies—such as mRNA-based formulations and viral vectors—while scientifically innovative, has also raised questions among the general population. Concerns about triggering autoimmune responses or unforeseen complications have made some potential recipients cautious. These platforms, although shown to be effective in other viral infections, are still subject to intense scrutiny in the context of EBV due to the virus’s complex behavior and links to long-term illnesses like certain cancers and neurological disorders. This cautious approach can slow down clinical recruitment, delay market rollout, and ultimately affect commercial performance.
Adding to the complexity is the challenge of developing a vaccine for a virus that can remain dormant for years in the human body. This raises the stakes for ensuring long-term safety, as the implications of viral reactivation or unintended immune responses are not yet fully understood. Regulators are therefore likely to require extensive post-trial monitoring and risk assessments, increasing the time and cost required for market entry. These added hurdles can discourage investment and prolong the timeline for product availability.
Clinicians, too, may be reluctant to recommend an EBV monovaccine without robust long-term data demonstrating safety and effectiveness. Gaining the confidence of both the medical community and the public will require ongoing education, transparent reporting of trial results, and clear communication about benefits versus risks. Until these safety concerns are addressed effectively, they will continue to restrain the pace of adoption and limit the potential reach of EBV monovaccines in the market.
Opportunities:
- Development of next-gen vaccine formulations
- Collaborations for vaccine development
- Integration of AI in vaccine design
-
Strain-specific vaccine development - The pursuit of strain-specific vaccines is creating a promising growth avenue within the Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) market. Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) is not a single uniform pathogen; it comprises multiple strains, with types 1 and 2 being the most dominant. These strains differ slightly in genetic makeup and clinical behavior, often resulting in varied disease progression and immune responses. Developing vaccines that are specifically designed to target the most prevalent or high-risk EBV strains can significantly enhance the precision and effectiveness of immunization strategies, especially for populations with higher vulnerability to severe EBV-associated conditions.
Strain-specific development enables scientists to refine vaccine antigens to match the unique characteristics of dominant viral variants. This level of targeting is particularly useful in tailoring vaccines for specific populations, age groups, or regions where certain EBV strains are more common or more virulent. Precision targeting can improve immune protection, reduce breakthrough infections, and build stronger public trust in the effectiveness of EBV vaccines. As a result, the approach aligns well with the broader trend toward customized, data-driven healthcare solutions.
Breakthroughs in genomic research and high-throughput sequencing technologies are also accelerating the potential of strain-specific vaccine design. With better tools to analyze viral genomes and mutation patterns, developers can more easily engineer vaccine candidates that respond to specific genetic signatures. This not only supports more agile development pipelines but also provides a scientific foundation for future-proofing vaccine designs against evolving EBV strains. mRNA platforms and viral vector technologies, in particular, offer the flexibility needed to update formulations as new strain-related data emerges.
Beyond clinical advantages, strain-specific vaccines also offer commercial benefits. Pharmaceutical companies can develop distinct formulations to serve targeted segments, opening up multiple market channels and enabling region-specific licensing. This approach may lead to faster regulatory approvals, greater patient acceptance, and expanded access. As demand for high-precision immunization continues to rise, the advancement of strain-specific vaccines is poised to become a key growth driver for the EBV monovaccine market in the coming years.
Monovaccine (Epstein - Barr virus) Competitive Landscape Analysis
Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market is witnessing increasing competition as pharmaceutical leaders and biotech firms intensify their focus on addressing the rising prevalence of Epstein-Barr Virus. Around 40% of industry players are actively engaged in clinical research, with strategic emphasis on innovation, collaboration, and partnerships to accelerate vaccine development and ensure significant growth potential in the coming years.
Market Structure and Concentration
The market shows moderate concentration, with approximately 35% share held by top-tier pharmaceutical companies. Smaller firms are contributing nearly 25% through novel pipelines, highlighting an evolving balance between established leaders and emerging innovators. Increased merger activities and structured strategies are shaping the competitive framework while driving expansion in niche therapeutic areas.
Brand and Channel Strategies
Around 45% of firms are adopting strong brand positioning with focus on advanced clinical phases, while 30% are building trust through targeted strategies in academic partnerships and healthcare collaborations. Distribution channels emphasize licensing agreements, hospital-based programs, and long-term partnerships, ensuring accessibility and strengthening market growth through diversified reach and innovative communication efforts.
Innovation Drivers and Technological Advancements
Nearly 50% of the competitive edge comes from investments in technological advancements such as recombinant platforms and novel adjuvant systems. Companies are leveraging AI-driven analytics and biomarker research to accelerate clinical outcomes. This emphasis on innovation and R&D-centric strategies is creating sustainable differentiation and enabling faster expansion of effective vaccine solutions against Epstein-Barr Virus.
Regional Momentum and Expansion
About 55% of vaccine development activities are concentrated in North America and Europe, driven by advanced research infrastructures. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific accounts for nearly 30% of emerging projects, reflecting rising investments and healthcare expansion. Regional collaboration, government-backed partnerships, and multinational strategies are boosting regional momentum and reinforcing clinical accessibility across growing healthcare markets.
Future Outlook
Over 60% of surveyed stakeholders believe the market will see accelerated growth supported by robust regulatory approvals and increased healthcare funding. Ongoing partnerships between biotech innovators and pharmaceutical leaders signal strong potential for pipeline breakthroughs. With continuing innovation and collaborative strategies, the future outlook emphasizes sustainable expansion and broader adoption of Epstein-Barr Virus monovaccines worldwide.
Key players in Monovaccine (Epstein - Barr virus) Market include:
- Moderna Inc.
- Atara Biotherapeutics
- Viracta Therapeutics
- AlloVir
- Nanatinostat
- Pfizer Inc.
- GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
- Sanofi S.A.
- Merck & Co., Inc.
- Novartis International AG
- Roche Holding AG
- AbbVie Inc.
- Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
- Danaher Corporation
- Cardinal Health Inc.
- Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
In this report, the profile of each market player provides following information:
- Market Share Analysis
- Company Overview and Product Portfolio
- Key Developments
- Financial Overview
- Strategies
- Company SWOT Analysis
- Introduction
- Research Objectives and Assumptions
- Research Methodology
- Abbreviations
- Market Definition & Study Scope
- Executive Summary
- Market Snapshot, By Cancer
- Market Snapshot, By Application
- Market Snapshot, By Region
- Monovaccine (Epstein - Barr virus) Market Dynamics
- Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities
- Drivers
- Increasing prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus-related diseases
- Growing awareness of Epstein-Barr virus's role in cancers and other conditions
- Advances in biotechnology driving monovaccine innovation
- Rising demand for personalized treatment options
- Restraints
- Complex nature of Epstein-Barr virus
- Limited understanding of virus pathogenesis
- Regulatory hurdles and approval processes
- Concerns about vaccine safety
- Opportunities
- Development of next-gen vaccine formulations
- Collaborations for vaccine development
- Integration of AI in vaccine design
- Strain-specific vaccine development
- Drivers
- PEST Analysis
- Political Analysis
- Economic Analysis
- Social Analysis
- Technological Analysis
- Porter's Analysis
- Bargaining Power of Suppliers
- Bargaining Power of Buyers
- Threat of Substitutes
- Threat of New Entrants
- Competitive Rivalry
- Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities
- Market Segmentation
- Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market, By Cancer, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
- Prostate
- Cervical
- Colorectal
- Throat
- Others
- Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market, By Application, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
- Mononucleosis
- Endemic Burkitts Lymphoma
- Hodgkins Lymphoma
- Gastric Carcinomas
- Multiple sclerosis
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Monovaccine (Epstein - Barr virus) Market, By Geography, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Nordic
- Benelux
- Rest of Europe
- Asia Pacific
- Japan
- China
- India
- Australia & New Zealand
- South Korea
- ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Countries)
- Rest of Asia Pacific
- Middle East & Africa
- GCC
- Israel
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle East & Africa
- Latin America
- Brazil
- Mexico
- Argentina
- Rest of Latin America
- North America
- Monovaccine (Epstein-Barr Virus) Market, By Cancer, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
- Competitive Landscape
- Company Profiles
- Moderna Inc.
- Atara Biotherapeutics
- Viracta Therapeutics
- AlloVir
- Nanatinostat
- Pfizer Inc.
- GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
- Sanofi S.A.
- Merck & Co., Inc.
- Novartis International AG
- Roche Holding AG
- AbbVie Inc.
- Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
- Danaher Corporation
- Cardinal Health Inc.
- Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- Company Profiles
- Analyst Views
- Future Outlook of the Market

