Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market

By Incontinence Type;

Stress Incontinence, Urge Incontinence, Mixed Incontinence, Overflow Incontinence, Functional Incontinence, and Total Incontinence

By Type;

External Urinary Incontinence Devices and Internal Urinary Incontinence Devices

By Application;

Ambulatory Surgical Centers, and Gynecology Clinics

By End Use;

Hospitals, Gynecological Clinics, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, and Homecare

By Geography;

North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and Latin America - Report Timeline (2021 - 2031).
Report ID: Rn107962877 Published Date: June, 2025 Updated Date: August, 2025

Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market Overview

Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market (USD Million)

Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market was valued at USD 865.76 million in the year 2024. The size of this market is expected to increase to USD 1390.22 million by the year 2031, while growing at a Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7.0%.


Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market

*Market size in USD million

CAGR 7.0 %


Study Period2025 - 2031
Base Year2024
CAGR (%)7.0 %
Market Size (2024)USD 865.76 Million
Market Size (2031)USD 1390.22 Million
Market ConcentrationMedium
Report Pages302
865.76
2024
1390.22
2031

Major Players

  • B Braun Melsungen
  • Baxter
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • C. R. Bard
  • Caldera Medical
  • Cogentix Medical
  • Coloplast
  • ConvaTec
  • Cook Medical
  • Covidien (Medtronic)
  • Ethicon
  • Karl Storz
  • Promedon
  • Prosurg

Market Concentration

Consolidated - Market dominated by 1 - 5 major players

Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market

Fragmented - Highly competitive market without dominant players


The Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market is witnessing significant growth, driven by the increasing prevalence of stress and urge incontinence in women. Around 40% of women over 40 experience some form of urinary incontinence, creating a strong demand for less invasive treatment options. These devices offer effective symptom management while avoiding the risks associated with major surgery.

Patient Preference for Non-Surgical Solutions
The shift toward non-invasive and user-friendly treatment devices is accelerating due to patient preference and improved quality of life outcomes. Nearly 60% of affected women now opt for minimally invasive treatments over traditional surgical options. Devices such as urethral slings and bulking agents are becoming mainstream, supported by better safety profiles and reduced recovery times.

Increased Awareness and Diagnosis Rates
Awareness campaigns and educational initiatives have improved early diagnosis and intervention rates for female urinary incontinence. With more than 50% of women previously hesitant to seek help, social stigma is gradually reducing, leading to higher treatment uptake. This behavioral shift is fostering growth in demand for discreet and minimally disruptive devices.

Rising Healthcare Investments in Women's Health
Governments and healthcare institutions are placing greater emphasis on women's urological health, resulting in higher funding and device accessibility. Reimbursement policies and insurance coverage have expanded, enabling broader adoption of minimally invasive solutions. This strategic focus is contributing to an estimated 45% rise in product utilization across hospital and ambulatory care settings.

  1. Introduction
    1. Research Objectives and Assumptions
    2. Research Methodology
    3. Abbreviations
  2. Market Definition & Study Scope
  3. Executive Summary
    1. Market Snapshot, By Incontinence Type
    2. Market Snapshot, By Type
    3. Market Snapshot, By Application
    4. Market Snapshot, By End Use
    5. Market Snapshot, By Region
  4. Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market Dynamics
    1. Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities
      1. Drivers
        1. Aging population demographics
        2. Technological advancements
        3. Increasing awareness
        4. Demand for non-surgical options
      2. Restraints
        1. Regulatory challenges
        2. Safety concerns
        3. Reimbursement limitations
        4. High initial costs
      3. Oppourtunities
        1. Emerging markets growth
        2. Technological innovation
        3. Strategic partnerships
        4. Patient education initiatives
    2. PEST Analysis
      1. Political Analysis
      2. Economic Analysis
      3. Social Analysis
      4. Technological Analysis
    3. Porter's Analysis
      1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
      2. Bargaining Power of Buyers
      3. Threat of Substitutes
      4. Threat of New Entrants
      5. Competitive Rivalry
  5. Market Segmentation
    1. Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market, By Incontinence Type, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. Stress Incontinence
      2. Urge Incontinence
      3. Mixed Incontinence
      4. Overflow Incontinence
      5. Functional Incontinence
      6. Total Incontinence
    2. Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market, By Type, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. External Urinary Incontinence Devices
      2. Internal Urinary Incontinence Devices
    3. Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market, By Application, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
      2. Gynecology Clinics
    4. Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market, By End Use, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. Hospitals
      2. Gynecological Clinics
      3. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
      4. Homecare
    5. Minimally Invasive Female Urinary Incontinence Devices Market, By Geography, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. North America
        1. United States
        2. Canada
      2. Europe
        1. Germany
        2. United Kingdom
        3. France
        4. Italy
        5. Spain
        6. Nordic
        7. Benelux
        8. Rest of Europe
      3. Asia Pacific
        1. Japan
        2. China
        3. India
        4. Australia & New Zealand
        5. South Korea
        6. ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Countries)
        7. Rest of Asia Pacific
      4. Middle East & Africa
        1. GCC
        2. Israel
        3. South Africa
        4. Rest of Middle East & Africa
      5. Latin America
        1. Brazil
        2. Mexico
        3. Argentina
        4. Rest of Latin America
  6. Competitive Landscape
    1. Company Profiles
      1. B Braun Melsungen
      2. Baxter
      3. Boston Scientific Corporation
      4. C. R. Bard
      5. Caldera Medical
      6. Cogentix Medical
      7. Coloplast
      8. ConvaTec
      9. Cook Medical
      10. Covidien (Medtronic)
      11. Ethicon
      12. Karl Storz
      13. Promedon
      14. Prosurg
  7. Analyst Views
  8. Future Outlook of the Market