Global Enteral Feeding Formula Market Growth, Share, Size, Trends and Forecast (2025 - 2031)

By Product;

Standard Formulas - [Monomeric and Polymeric] and Disease Specific - [Diabetic Formulas, Renal Formulas, Hepatic Formulas, Pulmonary Formulas, and Others]

By Application;

Critical Care, Gastroenterology, Oncology, Neurology, Diabetes, and Others

By Type of Tube Feeding;

Gastric Tube Feeding, Nasogastric Tube Feeding, Gastrotomy Tube Feeding and Duodenal Or Jejunal Tube Feeding

By End User;

Hospitals and Long Term Care Facilities - [Home Care Agencies & Hospices, Nursing Homes, and Assisted Living Facilities]

By Geography;

North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and Latin America - Report Timeline (2021 - 2031)
Report ID: Rn734837233 Published Date: June, 2025 Updated Date: July, 2025

Enteral Feeding Formula Market Overview

Enteral Feeding Formula Market (USD Million)

Enteral Feeding Formula Market was valued at USD 5,000.89 million in the year 2024. The size of this market is expected to increase to USD 8,766.98 million by the year 2031, while growing at a Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8.4%.


Global Enteral Feeding Formula Market Growth, Share, Size, Trends and Forecast

*Market size in USD million

CAGR 8.4 %


Study Period2025 - 2031
Base Year2024
CAGR (%)8.4 %
Market Size (2024)USD 5,000.89 Million
Market Size (2031)USD 8,766.98 Million
Market ConcentrationMedium
Report Pages315
5,000.89
2024
8,766.98
2031

Major Players

  • Abbott
  • Danone S.A
  • Fresenius Kabi AG
  • Nestlé
  • VICTUS
  • Primus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  • Meiji Holdings. Co., Ltd.
  • Mead Johnson & Company, LLC

Market Concentration

Consolidated - Market dominated by 1 - 5 major players

Global Enteral Feeding Formula Market

Fragmented - Highly competitive market without dominant players


The Enteral Feeding Formula Market is expanding due to rising nutritional support needs among critically ill and chronically affected patients. More than 60% of individuals in hospital care settings rely on enteral nutrition to meet dietary requirements. This growth is closely tied to rising cases of diseases that hinder normal food intake and digestion.

Shift Toward Safer, Digestive-Friendly Therapies
Healthcare professionals increasingly choose enteral feeding due to its digestive benefits and minimal invasiveness. Roughly 55% prefer enteral over intravenous feeding methods, emphasizing better gut stimulation and reduced complication risks. This trend is steering hospitals and clinics toward broader adoption of disease-specific feeding formulas.

Home-Based Care Transforming Nutritional Delivery
The availability of user-friendly enteral nutrition systems has transformed care beyond hospital walls. Over 50% of patients on long-term therapy now opt for home-based feeding solutions. This movement is backed by increased caregiver education, enabling effective and safer management of nutrition at home.

Policy Support Reinforcing Market Penetration
Clear clinical protocols and regulatory frameworks have solidified the role of enteral feeding in treatment routines. Nearly 65% of care facilities now apply structured enteral nutrition guidelines, ensuring consistency and safety. This institutional support continues to fuel the market’s sustained momentum.

  1. Introduction
    1. Research Objectives and Assumptions
    2. Research Methodology
    3. Abbreviations
  2. Market Definition & Study Scope
  3. Executive Summary
    1. Market Snapshot, By Product
    2. Market Snapshot, By Type of Tube Feeding
    3. Market Snapshot, By Application
    4. Market Snapshot, By End User
    5. Market Snapshot, By Region
  4. Enteral Feeding Formula Market Dynamics
    1. Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities
      1. Drivers
        1. Aging Population
        2. Prevalence of Chronic Diseases
        3. Increasing Incidence of Malnutrition
        4. Technological Advancements in Enteral Feeding Devices
      2. Restraints
        1. Limited Awareness and Education among Healthcare Professionals
        2. Risk of Complications such as Tube Dislodgement or Infection
        3. Reimbursement Challenges and Coverage Limitations
        4. Cost Constraints for Patients and Healthcare Systems
      3. Opportunities
        1. Home enteral nutrition demand rising
        2. Advancements in feeding device tech
        3. Untapped potential in emerging markets
        4. Critical care adoption increasing
    2. PEST Analysis
      1. Political Analysis
      2. Economic Analysis
      3. Social Analysis
      4. Technological Analysis
    3. Porter's Analysis
      1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
      2. Bargaining Power of Buyers
      3. Threat of Substitutes
      4. Threat of New Entrants
      5. Competitive Rivalry
  5. Market Segmentation
    1. Enteral Feeding Formula Market, By Product, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. Standard Formulas
        1. Monomeric
        2. Polymeric
      2. Disease Specific
        1. Diabetic Formulas
        2. Renal Formulas
        3. Hepatic Formulas
        4. Pulmonary Formulas
        5. Others
    2. Enteral Feeding Formula Market, By Type of Tube Feeding, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. Gastric Tube Feeding
      2. Nasogastric Tube Feeding
      3. Gastrotomy Tube Feeding
      4. Duodenal Or Jejunal Tube Feeding
    3. Enteral Feeding Formula Market, By Application, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)

      1. Critical Care

      2. Gastroenterology

      3. Oncology

      4. Neurology

      5. Diabetes

      6. Others

    4. Global Enteral Feeding Formula Market, By End User, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. Hospitals
      2. Long Term Care Facilities
        1. Assisted Living Facilities
        2. Nursing Homes
        3. Home Care Agencies & Hospices
    5. Enteral Feeding Formula Market, By Geography, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
      1. North America
        1. United States
        2. Canada
      2. Europe
        1. Germany
        2. United Kingdom
        3. France
        4. Italy
        5. Spain
        6. Nordic
        7. Benelux
        8. Rest of Europe
      3. Asia Pacific
        1. Japan
        2. China
        3. India
        4. Australia & New Zealand
        5. South Korea
        6. ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Countries)
        7. Rest of Asia Pacific
      4. Middle East & Africa
        1. GCC
        2. Israel
        3. South Africa
        4. Rest of Middle East & Africa
      5. Latin America
        1. Brazil
        2. Mexico
        3. Argentina
        4. Rest of Latin America
  6. Competitive Landscape
    1. Company Profiles
      1. Abbott
      2. Danone S.A
      3. Fresenius Kabi AG
      4. Nestlé
      5. VICTUS
      6. Primus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
      7. Meiji Holdings. Co., Ltd.
      8. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
  7. Analyst Views
  8. Future Outlook of the Market